ForumsQuestionsFeature request: another level or 2 for subtask hierarchy
Feature request: another level or 2 for subtask hierarchy
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
markjamesdavies |
Hi there
I often have tasks with subtasks in Toodledo and often want to use another level of subtask, e.g. Task 1 sub task 1.1 sub sub task 1.1.1 sub sub task 1.1.2 sub task 1.2 sub task 1.3 However, Toodledo limits the subtask hierarchy to one level (e.g. 1.1) I understand that it can be counterproduct to plan in too much detail (e.g. sub task 1.1.1.1.1.1.1. etc) but I really want to be able to make a sub task down to 3 levels (e.g. 1.1.1.) Thanks for listening Mark |
|
PeterW |
One thing you could consider is making the top level a folder. That would give you 3 levels.
|
|
Jake Toodledo Founder |
Thanks for the suggestion. We can't comment on a timeframe for implementation, but this is on our to-do list.
|
|
TaskAnimal |
This is THE issue stopping me from being a customer. One level of subtasks is simply not enough.
Posted by Toodledo: Thanks for the suggestion. We can't comment on a timeframe for implementation, but this is on our to-do list.
|
|
markjamesdavies |
Thanks for putting on your todo list Toodledo Admin.
|
|
gjeff |
I see a lot of questions on this request. I'd like to add my +1.
I understand that it's on the list but no time-frame can be given. The last update I can find in the forum is July, 2010 - Has anything new occurred here? Thanks :) |
|
gjeff |
man, dead as a doornail in this forum. Did anyone leave the lights @ Tooledo ?
|
|
PeterW |
@gjeff - quite a lot of progress is made here. It's just that the developer works on what he wants to work on, not necessarily on what you or I want him to.
Here is a link to a thread that provides some insight into how the developer decides what features to add and how forum requests are ranked: http://www.toodledo.com/forums/1/7343/0/locations-reverse-sort-and-more.html |
You cannot reply yet
U Back to topic home
R Post a reply
To participate in these forums, you must be signed in.